Mr. Levison oversees the firm's St. Louis practice in governmental relations and administrative affairs, with a concentration in economic development incentives, real estate and zoning.

He was a member of the Missouri Legislature's subcommittee on the privatization of government services.  In Washington D.C., Mr. Levison served on the staffs of the United States Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives.  He is currently the General Counsel of the Urban League of St. Louis.

As a trial lawyer he has made law in several distinct areas. Mr. Levison is a recognized leader of the organized bar, being one of only two lawyers in the history of The Missouri Bar to serve as President of both the Bar Association of Metropolitan St. Louis and the Trial Lawyers Association of St. Louis and to serve as a member of The Missouri Board of Governors. Mark is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Representative transactions in which Mark has been involved include:

• Representing Trizec Hahn in its purchase of the Met Square Building (over $100 million) in respect to tax incentive issues.
• Represented Pinnacle Entertainment in its successful attempt to win RFP's to build casinos in both St. Louis City and St. Louis County.
• Representing a client utilizing tax incremental financing and various other economic incentives in developing the first commercial office building constructed in East St. Louis in over three decades.
• Served as special counsel to the St. Louis Development Corporation in negotiating development rights for the Arena/Highlands site.
• Represented Washington University in real estate development and land use issues arising from its campus expansion into multiple municipal jurisdictions.

Representative examples of the litigation in which Mark has been involved include:

• Represented a national metals recycling corporation in the prosecution of an antitrust claim filed against one of the nation's largest telecommunications companies. Obtained a verdict in excess of $100 million, which at the time, was one of the largest verdicts in the nation.
• Defended a regional manufacturer in an antitrust action brought by a multi-national corporation. The claim asserted that the client was attempting to monopolize the market and further impinge upon the copyrights of the multi-national corporation. As a result of the representation, the defendant recovered more than $2 million in cash and benefits.
• Represented an entertainment promoter and venue owner in its defense of an antitrust action brought by another promoter. Secured dismissal prior to trial on a motion for summary judgment.